Who it bites, in the atlas →

WRP-3: No superluminal positive-energy warp drive survives

The live argument, with a dated score: superluminal and positive-energy, none; subluminal and positive-energy, one.

Kind: constraint · Family: WRP (The warp drive class) · Last reviewed: 2026-09-12

The result

Absence as a finding: as of September 2026 no peer-reviewed superluminal positive-energy warp drive has survived review. Lentz's 2021 soliton was found by Santiago, Schuster and Visser never to have solved the Einstein equations, and independently by Celmaster and Rubin (2025) to contain negative-energy regions and derivation errors; Lentz's reply is in conference proceedings and a blog post, not in a refereed paper. Fell and Heisenberg proved positivity for Eulerian observers only. The one surviving positive-energy result, Fuchs et al. (2024), is a constant-velocity subluminal shell. Rodal (2026) is "predominantly positive" and still violates the NEC. Helmerich et al. (2024) state that existing solutions have all required energy-condition violation

What it forbids or costs

The live argument, with a dated score: superluminal and positive-energy, none; subluminal and positive-energy, one

Escape hatches

A future construction outside the Natário class, or a peer-reviewed reply to the objections. Review this entry against the literature every six months

Who it bites

Physics proposals

Fictional drives

Sources